top of page

ree

I’ve heard this lazy narrative that Kenya's failure to match Singapore's economic miracle comes down to "just corruption." It's maddening how people spit out this simple nonsense without a bit of

history or real understanding. Sure, corruption is a bad sore in our nation, sucking up resources and slowing down growth, but blaming all our delay on it is like saying a flat tire is why your car never left the garage to begin with. It's ignorant, it's narrow-minded, and it lets everyone off the hook – from colonial ghosts to our own pathetic leadership and the lazy, self-serving attitudes hurting our society. We're not just victims of graft; we're part of a stuck system that started long before independence and keeps going because we, as a people, have been conditioned to be okay with being average.


Let's rip this apart, piece by piece, with facts that expose the real rot.


The Colonial Hangover: Africa's Brutal Exploitation vs. Asia's Less Devastating Scars

First off, anyone comparing Kenya to Singapore without acknowledging the vastly different colonial legacies is either clueless or deliberately blind. Colonization didn't just redraw maps; it rigged the economic game from the start. In Africa, European powers treated the continent like a giant loot box, extracting resources with zero regard for building sustainable institutions. The Atlantic slave trade alone decimated populations and economies, turning vibrant societies into shells conditioned to serve Western whims. African colonies were designed for raw exploitation – think forced labor, land grabs, and education systems that brainwashed locals into mimicking colonial masters while denying them real skills or autonomy. In Kenya, British rule imposed alien governance structures, disrupted traditional economies, and left us with a fractured society where people were pitted against each other through divide-and-rule tactics. Post-independence, this led to decades of stagnation as we unlearned the colonial mindset that valued obedience over innovation.


Contrast that with Asia, where colonization – while brutal – was often less totalizing. Slavery in Asia involved indentured labor with some nominal payments, unlike Africa's outright chattel slavery where millions were shipped off with no compensation, no education, and no path to personal development. Asian countries like Singapore inherited better infrastructure and trade networks from British rule, which focused more on commerce than pure extraction.


Sure, both regions decolonized around the same time – Singapore in 1965, Kenya in 1963 – but Kenya started from a GDP per capita of a measly $107, while Singapore was already at around $517, with established port facilities and a literate population primed for growth. African nations were left scrambling to build everything from scratch, including identities untainted by Western conditioning that stifled indigenous innovation. This isn't some vague excuse; it's a credible, documented reason why Africa lagged – colonial policies retarded economic development here far more than in Asia.


It's enraging how we ignore this, letting colonial powers off the hook while we tear each other apart over internal failures.


Post-Independence: Kenya's Crawl from the Abyss While Singapore Sprinted

After independence, Kenya didn't just "lag" – we were thrust into a world economy with our hands tied. Attracting foreign investment? Forget it; investors saw us as unstable backwaters riddled with tribal tensions fueled by colonial borders. It took decades to even stabilize, let alone industrialize. Our economy grew, but from such a low base that we're still playing catch-up. Meanwhile, Singapore exploded from a developing nation to a global powerhouse, with GDP per capita skyrocketing from about $517 in 1965 to over $156,000 today, while Kenya limps along at $7,530. This wasn't magic; it was strategy built on advantages we never had.


Singapore's Geographic Jackpot: The Real Engine of Their Meteoric Rise

Here's the kicker that makes the comparison even more ridiculous. Singapore's success isn't some anti-corruption fairy tale; it's geography on steroids. Sitting at the Strait of Malacca – a natural chokepoint for one-third of global shipping – Singapore was destined to be a trade hub. The government, under Lee Kuan Yew, ruthlessly capitalized on this by pouring billions into world-class ports, education, and infrastructure. They attracted foreign investment like a magnet, building an export-led economy that turned the tiny island into a manufacturing, finance, and high-tech powerhouse. GDP growth averaged around 6-7% for decades, fueled by policies emphasizing efficiency, stability, and rule of law. They invested heavily in human capital – top-tier education systems that produced a skilled workforce ready for global markets. Add to that a small, homogeneous population of just 6 million, easy to discipline and control culturally, and you've got a recipe for rapid upliftment. Foreign cash floods in, boosting GDP that trickles down to a manageable society where everyone buys into the vision – or gets sidelined.


Kenya? We're landlocked in opportunity terms, with no such golden location. Our attempts at attracting investment were hampered by instability, poor infrastructure, and yes, corruption – but the root is deeper. Singapore's rise outpaced not just Africa but the world because of this unbeatable edge. Blaming our woes solely on graft ignores this glaring fact, and it's not right.


Leadership: Visionary Discipline vs. Self-Serving Demi-Gods

Now, let's get to the leadership fiasco that's truly disgraceful. Lee Kuan Yew wasn't a saint, but he was a visionary who prioritized long-term development over personal glory. He built an orderly society where skilled governance trumped popularity, attracting expertise to craft policies that actually worked. In Singapore, people take public roles to make real impact, not to loaf around.

In Kenya? Some of our leaders are a joke – power-hungry egomaniacs who claw their way to the top for personal gain, then flaunt their ill-gotten wealth like badges of honor while their "poor subjects" starve. From Moi's era of rampant graft that tanked the economy to today's scandals, it's all about short-term popularity and lining pockets. They embrace ruling over impoverished masses because it makes them feel like demi-gods, untouchable and divine. This isn't leadership; it's parasitism, and it's what's keeping Africa down.


The Public Sector Plague: Lazy, Inefficient, and Rotten to the Core

But don't think it's just the top dogs – the real outrage is in our public sector, where laziness reigns supreme due to zero accountability. These so-called civil servants turn into slackers the moment they snag a government job, pushing papers and time-wasting while Kenyans rot in endless queues. Take the immigration department at Nyayo House: a cartel-ridden hellhole where passport applicants wait months, only to be hit with bribes or told to "come back tomorrow." Shortages of booklets? Underfunding? Bullshit excuses for inefficiency that kills opportunities – a delayed passport means a lost job abroad, a stalled business, a nation's progress halted. And don't get me started on unnecessary supply chains that inflate costs and delays for projects, all while corrupt officials skim off the top. This isn't incompetence; it's criminal laziness, and every Kenyan who tolerates it is part of the problem. These public sector leeches lack any way to measure contribution, so they just clock in, do nothing, and collect salaries funded by our taxes. It's pathetic, it's infuriating, and it demands a reckoning.


The Kenyan Mindset: Deals Over Duty, Favoritism Over Merit

Worse still, we've been brainwashed to see public jobs as golden tickets to quick riches through shady deals, not service. Grab the opportunity, bribe your way out of trouble later – after all, money talks louder than law in this cesspool. Institutional corruption runs so deep that people hire based on tribe, connections, or "favorable attributes" unrelated to the job, squeezing out the genuine talents who want to make an impact. The honest few? They're left broke and voiceless, while the cycle of graft perpetuates. This isn't just corruption; it's a cultural cancer we've all enabled, from the top brass to the everyday opportunist. We're not victims – we're accomplices in our own downfall.


But despite all the rot, the historical handicaps, the geographic disadvantages (specifically compared to Singapore since we can’t call ours an absolute disadvantage), the self-serving leaders, and our collective laziness when we clinch a job that we once looked up to, Kenya’s economy continues to thrive. It shows how even the slightest improvement in our collective discipline can propel it. The big question is whether it is possible!

BARACK OBAMA on What It Takes to Raise Boys
BARACK OBAMA on What It Takes to Raise Boys

Imagine sitting down with friends who are different from you. Maybe they love differently, identify differently, or see the world in ways you have never thought about. That is what Barack Obama talked about on a podcast called IMO, which was hosted by Michelle Obama and her brother Craig Robinson, on July 16, 2025. He shared a story about a gay professor from his college days who helped him become a better person. This is not just a nice story; it is a reminder that having all kinds of people around you, including those from the LGBTQIA+ community can make you kinder, wiser, and more understanding.



The College Professor

Back when Barack Obama was in college, being openly gay was not common. But he had a professor who was, and this man became one of his favorite teachers. Why? Because this professor did not just teach lessons from books, he called out Obama when he said things that were not thoughtful. That kind of honesty helped Obama see the world differently. It showed him that everyone, no matter who they love or how they identify, has something valuable to share.


This matters because when you have friends or mentors who are different, maybe they are gay, lesbian, transgender, or nonbinary, you learn to listen and understand. You stop judging and start seeing people for who they are. Obama said this is how young people, especially boys, grow into men who are strong but also kind. If you know someone who is LGBTQIA+, it helps others around you, like a friend or a child, who might feel alone in their identity. They will know they are not the only ones.



Why This Matters Now

This message comes at a tough time. Some leaders, like Donald Trump, have been saying harsh things about transgender people. In January 2025, a group called Human Rights Watch reported that Trump and his team wants to limit the rights of transgender people, saying they should not have the same space in society as reported by the Human Rights Watch (2025). This kind of talk makes life harder for people who are already fighting to be accepted.


But here is what I believe, and I think you will agree with me. I strongly feel that everyone deserves to live happily and safely, no matter whom they love or how they identify. Being gay, lesbian, transgender, or anything else does not make someone a bad person. It does not mean they are out to harm anyone. Science tells us that how people identify often comes from their biology, not something they choose because of friends or society. So why judge them? Their choices cannot stop you from living your life!



Learning from Each Other

Having LGBTQIA+ friends or mentors does not mean you will become like them even when you do not intent to and if you do, it should be perfectly okay. Obama had a gay professor, but that did not change who he was and neither did the professor expect him to become gay. It just made him more open-minded. I think that is the point! Meeting people who are different helps you grow without changing who you are at your core. It’s like adding new colors to a painting; it makes the picture richer, not wrong.


Some might say their faith does not agree with this. That is also okay. Your beliefs are between you and your God and nothing should compromise that. However, respecting others does not mean that you are giving up what you believe. It means letting people live their truth while you live yours. In any society, for instance, we know the value of community. It’s the idea that we are all connected. Including everyone, even those who are different, makes our community stronger.



The Bigger Picture

Barack Obama has been talking about this for years. In 2015, Obama was the first president to appear on the cover of a magazine called OUT, which is dedicated to the LGBTQIA+ community. This followed a celebration of a big court decision that legalized same-sex marriage in the United States. His saying that “Love is love” sparked controversy globally but he has maintained that that’s the kind of thinking the world needs. People should be seen as people rather than as labels.


When you have friends who are different, you are also helping yourself and this is synonymous with the fact that you hurt yourself more when you hate. And when you remain open-minded, you learn to listen, and to care, and to stand up for what is right and not for what is popular. That’s how we build a strong inclusive society-a world where everyone feels at home.


The Original Birkin Bag
The Original Birkin Bag

The Birkin bag now holds the world record as the most expensive fashion accessory ever sold. The auction took place in Paris on Thursday, July 10th, opening at €1.0 million. A bidding storm followed; offers doubled, tripled, and went up past €5 million. In just ten minutes, a final phone bid reached €7.0 million, which, after fees, amounted to a staggering €8.582 million (roughly US$10.1 million), making it the most expensive handbag ever sold at auction.


But where did the journey begin?

The story started in 1984, not in a design studio, but mid-air on a flight from Paris to London. Jane Birkin, the Franco-British actress and singer, was seated next to Jean-Louis Dumas, chairman and artistic director of the Hermès Group. As Birkin packed her basket in the overhead compartment, it tipped, spilling its contents across the cabin. The moment sparked a conversation about handbags and led Dumas to sketch a new rectangular design on an airsickness bag.


This sketch would become the very first Birkin bag!


The original Birkin bag vs. a cheaper replica
The original Birkin bag vs. a cheaper replica

Jane used that sample daily for years before donating it in 1994 to raise funds for AIDS charities. It changed hands again in 2000, purchased by Paris collector Catherine Benier. Meanwhile, the Birkin bag line became a global luxury icon, each hand-stitched in France, often priced above US $10,000, with large waiting lists. Some were even made in exotic leathers and sold for six figures.


The Buyer

The winning bidder of the Birkin bag remained anonymous at first but was later revealed to be a private collector from Japan who placed the call-in bid amid intense competition from eight others. Reports link the buyer to Valuence Japan Inc., a sustainable design company known for preserving cultural items. There are no reports on future resale of this expensive bag; instead, it will likely be exhibited publicly as a tribute to its legendary status.

bottom of page